Prioritization framework / scorecard

Decision Commit 6 items to Q3. Defer 11 items to Q4 candidate list. Drop 5 items entirely with written rationale. Scoring axes Each item scored 1–5 on: - Bet alignment (does it move Bet 1, 2, or 3?) - Outcome impact (predicted movement on the bet's metric) - Confidence (how sure are we?) - Effort (eng weeks; inverted for the score) - Reversibility (can we kill it without damage?) Top 6 (committed) 1. Route-suggestion v2: weather-aware (Bet 1, score 23). 2. Renewal-risk score in CSM workspace (Bet 2, score 22). 3. Partner portal MVP slice (Bet 3, score 21). 4. Two-step onboarding rollout to mobile (Bet 1, score 21). 5. Auto-triggered renewal play (Bet 2, score 19). 6. Activation backfill for last 90 days (foundational, score 19). Deferred (Q4 candidates) - Quote-to-job conversion analytics (Bet 1 support, score 17). - Crew-shift recommender (Bet 1 adjacent, score 16; high trust risk). - Renewal-risk Slack push (Bet 2 support, score 15). - Partner co-marketing dashboard (Bet 3 support, score 15). - + 7 more in the appendix. Dropped (with rationale) - Chatbot deflection. Repeats a prior failure. No new evidence. - Public API v2. No buyer demand in last 60 conversations. - White-label admin. Off-strategy (see strategy memo). - Mobile app redesign. Premature without onboarding telemetry. - SSO for SMB tier. Buyers aren't asking; sales-led. How disagreements got resolved Sponsor disagreement on item rank → revisit the bet alignment score together. If still contested, sponsor's call. No silent overrides. Next step Six committed items enter the sprint plan Friday. The deferred list reviewed at end of Q3 with fresh evidence.